I'm an actual lover in the H4831 powder. I get terrific velocity and accuracy away from any caliber I've tried out it in. From the 25-06 up to your 338 it's my head over to powder of selection. I check out every type of powders when Doing work up loads, though the H4831 usually seems to come out on best for precision and velocity when the situation is of your 06 course or bigger.
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's a shorter grain dimensions, thus, the designation SC or small Slice. The shorter, additional compact kernels enable the powder to circulation throughout the powder steps extra efficiently, assisting to relieve the continuous slicing of granules.
It is really probably that no even further dialogue is necessary, where situation we endorse starting off a whole new thread. If even so you really feel your reaction is necessary you'll be able to even now do so.
Minnesota H4831SC is my visit during the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am saving the small I've left for slide 2021. I'd get started small and work your way up, dependant upon what load data you have a look at for this combo the min/max loads are all around the board.
some cartridges have a tendency copper foul greater than Some others though, irrespective of how sleek the complete is within the bore and have to have cleansing of the copper fouling extra frequently.
Because there would not look like any "official" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can a few of you present a starting point with this mixture and things to think about when Performing this Load up?
i've utilized each and employed the exact same charges and possess not been capable of convey to any noticable variances with overall performance. the SC Model meters a bit smoother is about all. any reviews??
You could either: one) Go on and possess the objects outlined below mechanically removed from your shopping cart:
With all the smoother movement qualities arrives extra uniform demand weights, whilst the individual grains orient far more compactly, building better loading density.
locutus explained: I nevertheless have an excellent stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows as a result of my powder actions easily.
Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're wholly distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 currently being considerably speedier in comparison to the Hodgdon variants. Really don't address them as a similar powder, since they most certainly aren't.
It really is probably that no additional discussion is necessary, where scenario h4831sc load data we advise commencing a brand new thread. If nevertheless you really feel your reaction is required you are able to still accomplish that.
I am aware the H4831SC provides a better load density But I feel I have more than enough area in my case for the conventional H4831.
I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Just after months, I acquired Blessed and caught some H1000 on the web and of course paid out a bit more. The really next week in a gun display a h4831sc load data man had an entire circumstance of H1000 for $40 for each 1lb. I forget the amount, but Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a h4831 vs h4831sc delicate load.